Racewire Blog

Andre Banks

Must Read: White History 101

Though President’s Day would be a fitting moment for RaceWire to flip the script an go neocon for a day, don’t let this title fool you.

Taking Black History Month as his starting point, longtime Guardian correspondent Gary Younge makes a great argument in The Nation for a comprehensive telling (actually, retelling) of “White History”. Younge, in fact, firmly supports the Blackening of our shortest month, even while pointing to its intrinsic shortcomings:

Setting aside twenty-eight days for African-American history is insufficient, problematic and deserves our support for the same reason that affirmative action is insufficient, problematic and deserves our support. As one means to redress an entrenched imbalance, it gives us the chance to hear narratives that have been forgotten, hidden, distorted or mislaid.

But perhaps more importantly, he argues that all Americans, and particularly white Americans, should reject the mythology presented in history books and go deeper to understand the real story of white people in this country. A Black history lesson makes little sense without a real discussion of the collective responsibility white folks share in a system made successful through racism and imperialism.

When it comes to excelling at military conflict, everyone lays claim to their national identity; people will say, “We won World War II.” By contrast, those who say “we” raped black slaves, massacred Indians or excluded Jews from higher education are hard to come by. You cannot, it appears, hold anyone responsible for what their ancestors did that was bad or the privileges they enjoy as a result. Whoever it was, it definitely wasn’t “us.” This is one more version of white flight—a dash from the inconveniences bequeathed by inequality.

A critical point, well argued. Check it out.

Posted at 7:33 AM, Feb 19, 2007 in Featured | Permalink | View Comments


Share/Save/Bookmark

Comments

I also liked the essay on "white history". I am a white Canadian of English descent, and I studied British history. One grandfather was an unreconstructed British Imperialist who didn't even approve of Canada becoming a full nation of its own (circa 1937 or 1982, depending how you define it)! I think a lot about these issues of historical privilege and admitting to inconvenient truths. Colonialism is one of the most powerful oppressions in the world and very insidious.
In my opinion, the most notable thing in this essay was what he says about using passive voice for historical injustice--"MLK was assasinated" etc. I am also a lawyer and have read several fascinating studies about this use of the passive in rape cases--"she was raped", and even worse, "she got herself raped". Watching out for linguistic indirectness tells you a lot about what is being hidden in any narrative!--Norma Buydens

Posted by: Norma Buydens | February 27, 2007 11:14 AM

More biased P.C. garbage. Very convenient how you evade the fact that black africans and jews had a large part in the slave trade.

Posted by: Sergei | March 10, 2007 12:13 PM