Racewire Blog

Guest Columnist

Whoopi Goldberg takes The View, new host, same problems


Introducing Whoooooopi! Too bad Walters treats her like a sambo…

Barbara Walters, producer of ABC’s The View, has found herself a new token to fill the empty seat on the show that for years, has set out to represent women’s take on pop culture and current events.

Enter Whoopi Goldberg, with her gruffy comedy and impress-no-body attitude.

As many of us know, Goldberg is a widely loved and respected actor and comedian, and has been on The View a few times now. But after watching Walters introduce her as the new moderator, I was saddened to see Goldberg assure the other hosts and the audience that she won’t be “saying the type of things she’d normally say.”

Meaning, she will tone down her raw, liberal jokes. She even mentioned a talk with “the “powers that be”” about their concerns that she might get out of hand. Whoopi said they want her to be a little edgy and entertaining, but only as long as she can control herself.

Meanwhile, it remains too obvious that The View has gained the most attention from the political progressives who have acted out lately. First it was the falling out of Star Jones, who did not fully comply with the “powers.” Then it was the liberal commentary of Rosie O’’Donnell that spun out of control, people say.

The View’s’ ratings peaked during the buzz created by the Black woman and the lesbian. Now, with Goldberg, The View is looking to arouse but not upset, to subdue Whoopi but not let her brilliance, say…sway the presidential election. As long as she obeys her orders, we can presume she’ll stay.

That the great Whoopi Goldberg has to prove she is civil enough to participate in a show with three white women whose composures remain non-threatening, is disheartening.

—Sara Rosell, an intern at the Applied Research Center, is a junior rhetoric and ethnic studies major at the University of California-Berkeley.

Posted at 11:20 AM, Aug 03, 2007 in Permalink | View Comments


Share/Save/Bookmark

Comments

I don't think it's as much as Whoopi having to control herself with 3 white hosts, it's just that if you saw how Rosie O' Donnell acted during her stay on the View, it was really outrageous. When Rosie was on the View, she attacked Kelly Ripa, Donald Trump Elizabeth Hasselback and countless others. Arguments with her was like "I'm right, you're wrong". All her debates were one-sided. She has attacked the American gov't many times that almost bordered on treason. (Not excusing the gov't though myself, they are guilty of many terrible things). Given that, the execs @ ABC are nervous as heck. Star Jones abused her priveliges by trying to get free stuff for her wedding by advertising on the show. But if anything, Whoopi is really cool and would add a HEALTHY, POSITIVE side to debates instead becoming like Screaming Rosie.

Posted by: YOHAN | August 3, 2007 4:02 PM

Yes I do agree with you, but with Whoopi next to these three white hosts, I see that there is a flicker of suspicion looming over her just because she is an outlier among the three white women (just like Rosie was for being a Lesbian, and Star Jones for being Black). My point here is that I am not saying Whoopi will act out, in fact, I believe she will be wonderful on the show. But I feel that her presence on the show is shadowed by this Rosie/Star context in a way that automatically puts her in an undeserving prove-yourself-to-us-white-girls position. Whoopi is an admirable person who is conscious of herself and shouldn't need to have a finger shaken at her to warn her that she needs to be a good girl.

Posted by: Sara Rosell | August 4, 2007 10:57 AM

I have not forgotten the extremely racist and misogynistic sexual jokes that Whoopi helped write for her then married boyfriend Ted Danson. He sported black face make up (supplied by Whoopi's make up artist) at her roast at the Friar's Club. Their routine made Imus's remark seem tame. She refused to apologize and saw the skit as legitimate comedy. Though this incident happened in 1993, I have yet to hear Ms. Goldberg change her position. It is interesting that a so called progressive show that is supposed to reflect the voices of women would choose a woman who thinks that such behavior was justified.

Posted by: Oyatunde Amakisi | August 8, 2007 3:39 PM

Howdy! Whoopi said she has always been nice. She has also always be smart, always been funny and always been politically hip.
Whoopi does not need The View: The View needs Whoopi. I predict she will continue to be nice, smart, funny and politically hip, and be on The View just as long, or short, as she wants to be.
They are lucky to have her! for however long---or short!---it may be.

Posted by: Kris | August 8, 2007 4:55 PM

Um, my guess is that Ms. Goldberg said yes to this gig because the money is really good. And maybe she misses the spotlight, who knows? But I think we can pretty much bet that on her list of reasons was NOT "maybe I'll further the cause of racial justice."

Let's remember that celebrities are not supposed to be our political role models, OK?

I'm just looking for a few laughs, myself. And somebody who can say race on mainstream TV without gagging...

Posted by: Susan Starr | August 8, 2007 7:02 PM

I don't think Whoopi will last very long on the View. There seems to be a factor of what she needs to say and what she cannot say. Who starts off the conversation is the main thing and the results that incur will have the final say. Whether the voice that speaks comes from the powers that be and Whoopi responds or not. We are creatures of habit/nature(women) and at times gossiping can turn into serious dialogue and can often offend others. If she keeps quiet, she'll be safe and make a little change$$$. If she just lets them talk (the white women)and avoid the mayhem, then she may save herself from a career disaster. To dissuade others to express a "VIEW" may result in a name change. I'm sure Whoopi will remain in the safe mode.

Posted by: Debra | August 9, 2007 8:55 PM

I've waiting for a site where I could discuss the Star Jones/Barbara Walters fiasco. Perhaps Star was out of line with the wedding thing but Barbara Walters is so dishonest it hurts. She told everybody she was so surprised that Star spoke out and was fired but I happened to watch the view for a moment (probably for the first time in 2-3 years) when Star made a comment on the show and Barbara practically rolled her eyes. This was at least a month before Star got axed. Body language and gestures can say alot, if we just listen to them, and Barbara's body language and gestures spoke volumesthat day. If anybody saw the show they know it's true. Whoopi, good luck but I don't really see you staying if they're already trying to 'muzzle' you. If you fall for that, you won't even be the Whoopi I know.

Posted by: Roberta | August 17, 2007 5:51 PM