Megan Izen
On a Toxic Flight
Buried deep in the Health Tips section of South African Airways website is a small notice from the World Health Organization that requires them to disinsect the cabin of certain aircraft. They don’t tell you this when you buy your ticket or even before boarding the plane. I learned this the hard way on my journey home from a two-week stay in Mozambique and Swaziland, when once the doors were shut and there was no escape, a friendly pre-recorded voice filled the cabin telling us that the WHO says it’s okay to spray us and to cover our noses if we think we’ll have a bad reaction. Then the flight attendant uncovered two small aerosol cans, making his way to the front of the plane and back, covering us in a mist of strongly-perfumed chemicals.
I was confused and surprised because two weeks prior, when entering Mozambique from South Africa, our plane was spared the toxic mist shower gift. Only Mozambicans and other travelers entering South Africa are inundated in a confined space by known carcinogens. The active ingredient in the WHO-endorsed spray is permethrin, a toxic insecticide.
While I understand the need to prevent the spread of plant diseases from country to country, we should be told what we’re being sprayed with, the potential side effects and given an opt-out opportunity. I’m not sure what I would have done, but I know I would have tried to avoid ingesting something that made me ill for three full days. Travelers usually expect to get sick when abroad, and I’m no exception, but I anticipated fresh vegetables and water to do the damage, not South Africa Airways and the World Health Organization. It makes me wonder what other toxins are being forced on developing communities around the world for ‘the greater good’ without explanation or choice?
Posted at 2:44 PM, Dec 10, 2008 in Health | Permalink | View Comments
Comments
They should have explained it at least. I know that the issue was raised in Botswana's parliament - as to why planes are sprayed on outbound flights from Botswana to South Africa, but not on return flights from South Africa to Botswana. I understand the issue is to do with whether there are certain diseases prelevant in the area of departure.
Posted by: South African | December 10, 2008 11:43 PM
What a horrible experience. The WHO and World Bank have such an imperial attitude to any country outside of Europe or North America. Can you imagine this happening on a plane from LA to NYC? Its time we cleaned out the management of both organizations and re-staff with a diverse, representative work-force.
Thanks for sharing and informing us what the WHO is doing largely with American and European tax dollars.
Posted by: Steve McMaster | December 11, 2008 3:04 PM