Channing Kennedy
Stumped by NRO’s Sotomayor Cover? Try Being More Racist.
By now you’ve seen this hum-dinger of a cover that the National Review thought was a good idea (or maybe a so-bad-it’s-good idea, judging by their ready-to-go defense of it). Neil Sinhababu of Donkeylicious does an admirable job of putting himself in the magazine’s shoes and, erm, enlightens the rest of us. Is it a case of all brown people looking alike? Neil says:
Something like that is certainly in there, but the way I see the joke actually depends on incongruities between the stereotypes of the nonwhite ethnicities involved. The Buddha-like pose and Asian features are tied to lofty pretensions of sagelike wisdom. And what sort of person is it who’s pretending to be some kind of sage? A Hispanic woman! As if.The in-joke in this cover is for people who have already internalized a stereotype of Hispanic women as hotheaded and not that bright. Put one of them in the Buddha suit, and if you’ve absorbed the right racist stereotypes, the incongruity is hilarious.
Posted at 10:04 AM, Jun 08, 2009 in Permalink | View Comments
Comments
Salon managed to get NRO on the phone, and learned very little: http://www.salon.com/politics/war_room/2009/06/05/national_review/index.html?source=rss&aim=/politics/war_room
Posted by: channing | June 8, 2009 11:25 AM
The cover goes beyond race by using a religious image. This story compares the cover to the Obama fist pound New Yorker cover: http://www.newsy.com/videos/wise_latina_cover_to_cover
But of the New Yorker cover, I would say that the image they used was intelligent satire, whereas the Sotomayor cover blatantly plays off of stereotypes.
Posted by: Rosa | June 9, 2009 8:13 AM
Now, they are starting to attack the First Lady and blaming her for the attack.
http://www.fitsnews.com/2009/06/12/scgop-activist-posts-remark-disparaging-first-lady/
Posted by: Walter Greason | June 15, 2009 7:07 AM